About the Society
Papers, Posters, Syllabi
Submit an Item
Polmeth Mailing List
Below results based on the criteria 'Bayesian statistics'
Total number of records returned: 8
Estimation and Inference by Bayesian Simulation: an on-line resource for social scientists
Markov chain Monte Carlo
http://tamarama.stanford.edu/mcmc a Web-based on-line resource for Markov chain Monte Carlo, specifically tailored for social scientists. MCMC is probably the most exciting development in statistics in the last ten years. But to date, most applications of MCMC methods are in bio-statistics, making it difficult for social scientists to fully grasp the power of MCMC methods. In providing this on-line resource I aim to overcome this deficiency, helping to put MCMC in the reach of social scientists. The resource comprises: (*) a set of worked examples (*) data and programs (*) links to other relevant web sites (*) notes and papers At the meetings in Atlanta, I will present two of the worked examples, which are part of this document: (*) Cosponsor: computing auxiliary quantities from MCMC output (e.g., percent correctly predicted in a logit/probit model of legislative behavior; cf Herron 1999). (*) Delegation: estimating a time-series model for ordinal data (e.g., changes to the U.S. president's discretionary power in trade policy, 1890-1990; cf Epstein and O'Halloran 1996).
Pooling Disparate Observations
Bartels, Larry M.
Data analysts frequently face difficult choices about whether to pool disparate observations in their statistical analyses. I explore the inferential ramifications of such choices, and propose a new technique, dubbed "fractional pooling," which provides a simple way to incorporate prior beliefs about the theoretical relevance of disparate observations. The technique is easy to implement and has a plausible rationale in Bayesian statistical theory. I illustrate the potential utility of fractional pooling by applying the technique to political data originally analyzed by Ashenfelter (1994), Powell (1982), and Alesina et al. (1993). These examples demonstrate that conventional approaches to analyzing disparate observations can be seriously misleading, and that the approach proposed here can enrich our understanding of the inferential implications of unavoidably subjective judgments about the theoretical relevance of available data.
Too many Variables? A Comment on Bartels' ModelAveraging Proposal
Erikson, Robert S.
Wright, Gerald C.
McIver, John P.
Bayesian Information Criterion
Abstract: Bartels (1997) popularizes the procedure of model- averaging (Raftery, 1995, 1997), making some important innovations of his own along the way. He offers his methodology as a technology for exposing excessive specification searches in other peoples' research. As a demonstration project, Bartels applied his version of model- averaging to a portion of our work on state policy and purports to detect evidence of considerable model uncertainty. . In response, we argue that Bartels' extensions of model averaging methodology are ill-advised, and show that our challenged findings hold up under the scrutiny of the original Raftery-type model averaging.
Democracy as a Latent Variable
latent class analysis
Markov chain Monte Carlo
Measurement is critical to the social scientific enterprise. Many key concepts in social-scientific theories are not observed directly, and researchers rely on assumptions (tacitly or explicitly, via formal measurement models) to operationalize these concepts in empirical work. In this paper we apply formal, statistical measurement models to the Polity indicators of democracy and autocracy, used widely in studies of international relations. In so doing, we make explicit the hitherto implicit assumptions underlying scales built using the Polity indicators. We discuss two models: one in which democracy is operationalized as a latent continuous variable, and another in which democracy is operationalized as a latent class. Our modeling approaches allow us to assess the measurement error in the resulting measure of democracy. We show that this measurement error is considerable, and has substantive consequences when using a measure of democracy as an independent variable in cross-national statistical analysis. Our analysis suggests that skepticism as to the precision of the Polity democracy scale is well-founded, and that many researchers have been overly sanguine about the properties of the Polity democracy scale in applied statistical work.
Presidential Approval: the case of George W. Bush
dynamic linear model
Markov chain Monte Carlo
pages of killer graphs
We use a Bayesian dynamic linear model to track approval for George W. Bush over time. Our analysis deals with several issues that have been usually addressed separately in the extant literature. First, our analysis uses polling data collected at a higher frequency than is typical, using over 1,100 published national polls, and data on macro-economic conditions collected at the weekly level. By combining this much poll information, we are much better poised to examine the public's reactions to events over shorter time scales than can the typical analysis of approval that utilizes monthly or quarterly approval. Second, our statistical modeling explicitly deals with the sampling error of these polls, as well as the possibility of bias in the polls due to house effects. Indeed, quite aside from the question of ``what drives approval?'', there is considerable interest in the extent to which polling organizations systematically diverge from one another in assessing approval for the president. These bias parameters are not only necessary parts of any realistic model of approval that utilizes data from multiple polling organizations, but easily estimated via the Bayesian dynamics linear model.
Teaching Bayesian applied statistics to graduate students in political science, sociology, public health, education, economics, ...
I share some thoughts on teaching applied regression and Bayesian methods to students in political science and other fields.
Joint Modeling of Dynamic and Cross-Sectional Heterogeneity: Introducing Hidden Markov Panel Models
Park, Jong Hee
Hidden Markov models
Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo
Researchers working with panel data sets often face situations where changes in unobserved factors have produced changes in the cross-sectional heterogeneity across time periods. Unfortunately, conventional statistical methods for panel data are based on the assumption that the unobserved cross-sectional heterogeneity is time constant. In this paper, I introduce statistical methods to diagnose and model changes in the unobserved heterogeneity. First, I develop three combinations of a hidden Markov model with panel data models using the Bayesian framework; (1) a baseline hidden Markov panel model with varying fixed effects and varying random effects; (2) a hidden Markov panel model with varying fixed effects; and (3) a hidden Markov panel model with varying intercepts. Second, I present model selection methods to diagnose the dynamic heterogeneity using the marginal likelihood method and the reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo method. I illustrate the utility of these methods using two important ongoing political economy debates; the relationship between income inequality and economic growth and the effect of institutions on income inequality.
A Statistical Method for Empirical Testing of Competing Theories
finite mixture model
false discovery rate
Empirical testing of competing theories lies at the heart of social science research. We demonstrate that a very general and well-known class of statistical models, called finite mixture models, provides an effective way of rival theory testing. In the proposed framework, each observation is assumed to be generated from a statistical model implied by one of the theories under consideration. Researchers can then estimate the probability that a specific observation is consistent with either of the competing theories. By directly modeling this probability with the characteristics of observations, one can also determine the conditions under which a particular theory applies. We discuss a principled way to identify a list of observations that are statistically significantly consistent with each theory. Finally, we propose several measures of the overall performance of a particular theory. We illustrate the advantages of our method by applying it to an influential study on trade policy preferences.