image image
Media

Document Detail


permalink to this item
WORKING PAPER
Rational Expectations Coordinating Voting in American Presidential and House Elections
Mebane, Walter R.

Abstract
I define a probabilistic model of individuals' presidential-year vote choices for President and for the House of Representatives in which there is a coordinating (Bayesian Nash) equilibrium among voters based on rational expectations each voter has about the election outcomes. I estimate the model using data from the six American National Election Study Pre-/Post-Election Surveys of years 1976--1996. The coordinating model passes a variety of tests, including a test against a majoritarian model in which there is rational ticket splitting but no coordination. The results give strong individual-level support to Alesina and Rosenthal's theory that voters balance institutions in order to moderate policy. The estimates describe vote choices that strongly emphasize the presidential candidates. I also find that a voter who says economic conditions have improved puts more weight on a discrepancy between the voter's ideal point and government policy with a Democratic President than on a discrepancy of the same size with a Republican President.

Keywords
Bayesian-Nash equilibrium
congressional elections
coordinating voting
generalized extreme value model
maximum likelihood
Monte Carlo integration
nonparametric
policy moderation
presidential elections
probabilistic voting
rational expectations
retrospective voting
spatial voting
ticket splitting
voter equilibrium


File
icnPdfMini meban98.pdf


Uploaded
07-08-1998

Document ID Number
297


   
wustlArtSci